🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a prominent peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that states globally are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.